Balance

To redeem the filth of the last post, here is a picture of a girl with huge cans.


Feel free to ignore her face as it's not that great. But even as an ass man myself, I can't help but appreciate the beauty that is a handful of sideboob spilling over. My cup runneth over.

EDIT: as not to overshadow Andrew's post again, here are some more pictures of hot girls, Gossip Girl style











Serena reclaims the top spot as far as I'm concerned. Ass is looking just too good. I'm surprised at how good Vanessa looks. I attribute it to her genius decision to not wear a bra. Ladies, take note.

NO HOMO

WTF, Nike bowed to pressure by the gays and is removing their Hyperdunk campaign ads in order to 'underline our ongoing commitment to supporting diversity in sport and the workplace' (link)

I think you'd have to be a fudgepacker to think that ad is gay in any way. The first time I saw it, I thought it was hilarious and chalked it up to another solid piece of work by W+K. I mean, is there anybody that watches basketball at all that will view this as homophobic? Getting dunked on, aka 'poster-ized', is an incredibly embarassing experience. That is what the whole campaign is about and it extends to this ad.

I feel like buying an extra pair of Nikes just to spite the gays. This is the cancer that's killing America. Just because a bunch of fags have too much cock on the brain does not mean everything is homophobic. I'm sure any gay person that plays/watches basketball and understands the sport beyond looking for jerk-off material will not find this ad gay. Nike should be ashamed of themselves for bowing to this type of pressure.

No homo on this entire post.

This is what we call a Stan.

Oxymoron.

According to Mel, if this dude was in China, he might as well be Obama.

Anyways:


Hot, huh?

YOU PERVERT SHES ONLY FIFTEEN SHE DOESNT WANT TO KNOW WANT TO PLAY JUST THE TIP OR DOES SHE SHE LOOKS READY WELL SHES NOT YOU SICK FUCK GOD DAMN IT BUT JUST LOOK AT HER SHE HAS SPONGEBOB PANTIES WHATS WRONG WITH THE KIDS THESE DAYS THEY JUST WANNA HAVE FUN MAN NO YOU FUCK THATS WRONG LIKE YOU DONT WOULDNT WANT TO BE IN THE MIDDLE OF THAT FLUFFY PILLOW FIGHT GETTING SMOTHERED WITH ALL THE YOUNG TANNED BEAUTIES DISCOVERING THEMSELVES NO NO NO I DONT YOU SURE YES YOU ARE A FAG GOD DAMN IT FINE MAYBE JUST A LITTLE BIT

im exhausted yo.

if there is a god...

...he will name oklahoma's new nba team, the oklahoma city WIND.

hahaha

for the record, all six potential names blow. you choose: barons, energy (sounds like a wnba team, though i guess that's nothing to laugh about after the Palace Brawl part deux), bison, "marshalls," thunder, or wind (outside of your regular fart jokes, it also sounds wnba-ish).


haha just kidding i laughed for a straight week after reading about this "brawl."

Batman = Bush

Duh. Assuming you haven't read this, an Op-Ed from the WSJ:

What Bush and Batman Have in Common

By ANDREW KLAVAN
July 25, 2008; Page A15

A cry for help goes out from a city beleaguered by violence and fear: A beam of light flashed into the night sky, the dark symbol of a bat projected onto the surface of the racing clouds . . .

Oh, wait a minute. That's not a bat, actually. In fact, when you trace the outline with your finger, it looks kind of like . . . a "W." (Justin's note: LOL)

There seems to me no question that the Batman film "The Dark Knight," currently breaking every box office record in history, is at some level a paean of praise to the fortitude and moral courage that has been shown by George W. Bush in this time of terror and war. Like W, Batman is vilified and despised for confronting terrorists in the only terms they understand. Like W, Batman sometimes has to push the boundaries of civil rights to deal with an emergency, certain that he will re-establish those boundaries when the emergency is past.

And like W, Batman understands that there is no moral equivalence between a free society -- in which people sometimes make the wrong choices -- and a criminal sect bent on destruction. The former must be cherished even in its moments of folly; the latter must be hounded to the gates of Hell.

"The Dark Knight," then, is a conservative movie about the war on terror. And like another such film, last year's "300," "The Dark Knight" is making a fortune depicting the values and necessities that the Bush administration cannot seem to articulate for beans.

Conversely, time after time, left-wing films about the war on terror -- films like "In The Valley of Elah," "Rendition" and "Redacted" -- which preach moral equivalence and advocate surrender, that disrespect the military and their mission, that seem unable to distinguish the difference between America and Islamo-fascism, have bombed more spectacularly than Operation Shock and Awe.

Why is it then that left-wingers feel free to make their films direct and realistic, whereas Hollywood conservatives have to put on a mask in order to speak what they know to be the truth? Why is it, indeed, that the conservative values that power our defense -- values like morality, faith, self-sacrifice and the nobility of fighting for the right -- only appear in fantasy or comic-inspired films like "300," "Lord of the Rings," "Narnia," "Spiderman 3" and now "The Dark Knight"?

The moment filmmakers take on the problem of Islamic terrorism in realistic films, suddenly those values vanish. The good guys become indistinguishable from the bad guys, and we end up denigrating the very heroes who defend us. Why should this be?

The answers to these questions seem to me to be embedded in the story of "The Dark Knight" itself: Doing what's right is hard, and speaking the truth is dangerous. Many have been abhorred for it, some killed, one crucified.

Leftists frequently complain that right-wing morality is simplistic. Morality is relative, they say; nuanced, complex. They're wrong, of course, even on their own terms.

Left and right, all Americans know that freedom is better than slavery, that love is better than hate, kindness better than cruelty, tolerance better than bigotry. We don't always know how we know these things, and yet mysteriously we know them nonetheless.

The true complexity arises when we must defend these values in a world that does not universally embrace them -- when we reach the place where we must be intolerant in order to defend tolerance, or unkind in order to defend kindness, or hateful in order to defend what we love.

When heroes arise who take those difficult duties on themselves, it is tempting for the rest of us to turn our backs on them, to vilify them in order to protect our own appearance of righteousness. We prosecute and execrate the violent soldier or the cruel interrogator in order to parade ourselves as paragons of the peaceful values they preserve. As Gary Oldman's Commissioner Gordon says of the hated and hunted Batman, "He has to run away -- because we have to chase him."

That's real moral complexity. And when our artistic community is ready to show that sometimes men must kill in order to preserve life; that sometimes they must violate their values in order to maintain those values; and that while movie stars may strut in the bright light of our adulation for pretending to be heroes, true heroes often must slink in the shadows, slump-shouldered and despised -- then and only then will we be able to pay President Bush his due and make good and true films about the war on terror.

Perhaps that's when Hollywood conservatives will be able to take off their masks and speak plainly in the light of day.

Now, the utter stupidity of this comparison is obvious. Hopefully people who read this site got an immediate 'wait... wtf?!' without me explaining it. But here it goes anyways, some SPOILERS:

• Batman is a vigilante superhero operating outside of the jurisdiction of the law; Bush is a publicly elected official sworn to uphold the laws of this country
• There's a reason why Harvey Dent's public image needed to be kept up despite him FAILING BY BECOMING A VIGILANTE. People need to place their hope and trust in a person that solves problems within the structure of the law. Was this not the point of the movie?
• The writer of this piece is exactly like the man on the civilian boat so ready to blow up the criminals. It should've been obvious someone so convinced of their moral superiority will be unable to see the movie's complexities.
  

If you read the comments section on the WSJ, some people completely agree with this writer's sentiment: Bush is a hero and liberals are just hating. Some gems:

1. As Batman knew how to recognize evil so has President Bush. As Batman threw all his available resources against the Joker so has President Bush used all the available resources of the United Staes against Islamo-facism. And despite the fact that Batman and President Bush are both vilified as evil they both are true heroes. Indeed President Bush may well deserve to be remembered in history as the "Dark Knight". - Stanley Wisniewski (jew)
2. I agree with this commentary. This country is certainly not the America I knew as a teenager.
   
   Today, teenagers denigrate God, disrespect our country and flag, and eschew our traditional values in lieu of European hedonism. (what kind of old man still talks about Europe like that?)
   
   So, yes, President Bush, like Batman is reviled by misguided pseudo-compassionates. Who cares? The Iraqis appreciate the efforts our men and women have made there. And, they recognize that the one person in the entire world who backed them up since Day One, was George W. Bush. - Roger Cotton
3. Awesome. Shout it from the mountain top and publish it throughout the land because W, God bless him, just can seem to do it for himself. - Mike Falatko

I know the WSJ is a conservative publication along with Murdoch at the helm, but printing an editorial declaring Batman = Bush because the Bat symbol looks like a 'W' just screams 'desperate for attention'. Are sales really that bad?

Nigo is a huge nerd

Nigo has one of the largest Star Wars collections in the world. I'm sure Andrew thinks it's totally awesome or something to that effect. But honestly, it's just really nerdy. Star Wars is not that cool.

Yeah, I said it.

You can watch another video on Pharrell's diamonds and gold carabiners and iPhone at my Tumblr.

DJ Khaled Holds Kanye Hostage

DJ Khaled aka da bessss reveals his true terrorist nature. Just look at how scared Kanye is. Also notice how hard he's trying to pretend to enjoy himself. Why does DJ Khaled have gorilla arms?

Also recommended is to just watch this video in silence.